<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Nerd Score</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hansmast.com/2005/07/my_nerd_score/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hansmast.com/2005/07/my_nerd_score/</link>
	<description>Pictures of the world, religious commentary, political thoughts, technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:12:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://hansmast.com/2005/07/my_nerd_score/comment-page-1/#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>Hey, I scored 18 on the nerd test, and Naomi scored 6.  I never realized my wife was cooler than me!  I guess I should have known.  No wonder both of us get confused by this computer stuff sometimes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I scored 18 on the nerd test, and Naomi scored 6.  I never realized my wife was cooler than me!  I guess I should have known.  No wonder both of us get confused by this computer stuff sometimes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Mast</title>
		<link>http://hansmast.com/2005/07/my_nerd_score/comment-page-1/#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Mast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>Andrew: Waaah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew: Waaah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Schrock</title>
		<link>http://hansmast.com/2005/07/my_nerd_score/comment-page-1/#comment-1634</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Schrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1634</guid>
		<description>My nerd score is 10.  I am not nerdy, but then again maybe not all that cool either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My nerd score is 10.  I am not nerdy, but then again maybe not all that cool either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Schrock</title>
		<link>http://hansmast.com/2005/07/my_nerd_score/comment-page-1/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Schrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>My loser score is 85.  I am a loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My loser score is 85.  I am a loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X Software Developer</title>
		<link>http://hansmast.com/2005/07/my_nerd_score/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>X Software Developer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 05:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>Each of the options on the quiz is technically a programming language. See the list of languages at the bottom of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_language&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The question on the quiz was most likely tongue-in-cheek--as in, which language will not be used by a &quot;real&quot; programmer. The correct answer is &quot;BASIC,&quot; because many geeks view it as language for wimps. Thus, my explanation about why geeks dislike it, followed by my analysis and defense of the language. (In defending it, I&#039;ve just proved I&#039;m not a geek.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are right that OOP is about using classes, methods, and properties. I should have clarified that VB does have some support for OOP, but it is limited. For example, forms are objects, and you can declare class modules. In VBA (and presumably in VB 6), all classes must be in separate modules. This is enough to discourage programmers from using a lot of classes. Also, advanced OOP functionality like inheritance is not available in VBA and VB 6.&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each of the options on the quiz is technically a programming language. See the list of languages at the bottom of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_language" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_language</a></p>
<p>The question on the quiz was most likely tongue-in-cheek&#8211;as in, which language will not be used by a &#8220;real&#8221; programmer. The correct answer is &#8220;BASIC,&#8221; because many geeks view it as language for wimps. Thus, my explanation about why geeks dislike it, followed by my analysis and defense of the language. (In defending it, I&#8217;ve just proved I&#8217;m not a geek.)</p>
<p>You are right that OOP is about using classes, methods, and properties. I should have clarified that VB does have some support for OOP, but it is limited. For example, forms are objects, and you can declare class modules. In VBA (and presumably in VB 6), all classes must be in separate modules. This is enough to discourage programmers from using a lot of classes. Also, advanced OOP functionality like inheritance is not available in VBA and VB 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Mast</title>
		<link>http://hansmast.com/2005/07/my_nerd_score/comment-page-1/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Mast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>X Software Developer, nice dissertation. It raises another question for clueless little me: VB6 isn&#039;t OOP? I always thought OOP was Object.Property and Object.Method and using classes, etc. What is OOP?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, that isn&#039;t the question I wanted discussion on... I was talking about which of the languages in the quiz isn&#039;t a real programming language. The options were:&lt;br /&gt;
BASIC&lt;br /&gt;
C++&lt;br /&gt;
PASCAL&lt;br /&gt;
Assembly&lt;br /&gt;
FORTRAN&lt;br /&gt;
COBOL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I have it figured out now, but I&#039;m curious what you think and why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X Software Developer, nice dissertation. It raises another question for clueless little me: VB6 isn&#8217;t OOP? I always thought OOP was Object.Property and Object.Method and using classes, etc. What is OOP?</p>
<p>Second, that isn&#8217;t the question I wanted discussion on&#8230; I was talking about which of the languages in the quiz isn&#8217;t a real programming language. The options were:<br />
BASIC<br />
C++<br />
PASCAL<br />
Assembly<br />
FORTRAN<br />
COBOL</p>
<p>I think I have it figured out now, but I&#8217;m curious what you think and why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X Software Developer</title>
		<link>http://hansmast.com/2005/07/my_nerd_score/comment-page-1/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>X Software Developer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1630</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re probably hoping for an impassioned, slashdot-style squabble about Visual Basic. Sorry, you’re not getting that.</p>
<p>Some programmers do not consider Visual Basic a real programming language because they think it is used solely by amateurs to cobble together poorly designed programs and because the syntax is so different from their favorite languages, C++ and Java.</p>
<p>On the contrary, Visual Basic is certainly a real programming language. It is lacking in some areas, but that is hardly surprising. Every programming language works well in a certain domain, and each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Visual Basic has nice tools for user interfaces and excellent support for COM. Its disadvantages include the lack of object-oriented programming. (Visual Basic .Net does finally support objected oriented programming, at the expense of support for legacy code.) The lack of support for object-oriented programming does not pose a problem for small projects, but for large projects it can be a detriment. When deciding which language is best for a specific program, you have to weigh the advantages. For example, is it more important to be able to build a nice user interface easily, or is it more important to be able to write objected-oriented code?</p>
<p>Ultimately, the language that you use is less important than how well your program works. Writing a good program should make you prouder than learning a particular language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Mast</title>
		<link>http://hansmast.com/2005/07/my_nerd_score/comment-page-1/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Mast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>Muhahahaha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muhahahaha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://hansmast.com/2005/07/my_nerd_score/comment-page-1/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>61. Guess I&#039;m just not as big a nerd as you. What a shame...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>61. Guess I&#8217;m just not as big a nerd as you. What a shame&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

