• 07Dec
    Categories: Science Comments: 1

    I saw an interesting piece in Popular Mechanics:

    Long in the Tooth

    Scientists can now more accurately determine the year of your birth, by measuring the amount of radioactive carbon-14 in your teeth. Above-ground nuclear testing between 1955 and 1963 created a dramatic rise in atmospheric carbon-14, which has steadily decreased ever since. As tooth enamel is formed during childhood, carbon-14 gradually settles in, proving how long you’ve shared the planet with the atomic bomb.

    This shows the pitfalls of historical science. Events (the advent of the nuclear age in this case) that may or may not be known can throw a huge wrench in the calculations. If a radioactive volcano spewed or a global flood or something like that happened that scientists haven’t figured out, it totally messes up their long-term extrapolations.

    If scientists wouldn’t have been aware of this nuclear testing, they would assume that dead people they find with lots of carbon-14 must be much older than they actually are. Unless they somehow figure out that the nuclear tests happened, they would continue in their ignorance.

    If you weren’t there to see it happen or if you don’t have multiple corroborating accounts, it might have happened and it might not have happened. That is the pitfall of any science that attempts to figure out what happened in the past.

  • 06Dec
    Categories: Political Comments: 7

    Earlier I had said that I was resting easy about Iran’s nuclear weapons-making facilities because I was sure that the Israelis would take them out (like they did to Iraq) if no-one else had the guts to do so. However, the US Army War College has just released a report that says that Israel doesn’t have the capability to do so:

    Geopolitical limitations render Israel’s air force militarily incapable of halting Iran’s nuclear weapons program according to a new report published the by U.S. Army War College.

    The report asserts Israel lacks the military capability to locate and destroy Iranian nuclear assets. The report said the Israel Air Force cannot operate at such long distances from its bases.

    That triggered immediate scepticism. I immediately thought, “How about when Israel bombed PLO headquarters in Tunisia?” I checked it out. According to the report:

    Brom said Iranian nuclear assets are located between 1,500 and 1,700 kilometers from Israel.

    So, at 1500-1700 Km, can they do it? Let’s take a look at what they’ve done in the past with Operation Wooden Leg, where ten F-15s struck PLO headquarters in Tunis, Tunisia with a single Boeing 707 (built in 1950; the first ever successful commercial airliner; read: really old technology) for mid-air refueling. The PLO headquarters were 3,000 Km away! That’s double the distance to Iranian nuclear assets! And they did it in 1985 with technology from 1950 (Boeing 707) and 1972 (F-15E)! So, you can see why my scepticism.

    However, there are extenuating circumstances. The flight to Tunisia was over the neutral waters of the Mediterranean. The strike was in a small African country with no Air Force to speak of. The flight to Iran would need to overfly Jordan or Syria, both unfriendly territory. They would need to fly low to avoid radar detection which takes up extra fuel. They would have friendly territory to fly across in US-occupied Iraq. However, they overflew that unfriendly territory before when they hit the Iraqi Osirak nuclear reactor and that was a strike that was 1,100 Km in length, only 400-600 Km less than an Iranian strike.

    Furthermore, the legendary Mossad has the capability to pinpoint the location of Iran’s nuclear assets. Also of interest is the time that Israel took five planes filled with 100 commandoes down to Entebbe, Uganda (a distance of approximately 3,200 Km) to free a bunch of Israeli and Jewish hostages held by Arab terrorists that had hijacked an airliner.

    I think that Israel has the capability to do it. Everyone thought that the Osirak strike was impossible, too. They said it was too far away and over hostile territory. They never dreamt Israel would do it because they thought they couldn’t! They were proved wrong. In this case they have the additional advantage of flying over a friendly Iraq and the hawkish Bush administration would consider lending refueling support to any strike. The US has just as little interest in Iran becoming a nuclear power as does Israel. Really, the easiest thing would be if the US simply lent an Iraqi Air Force base to Israel for a couple of days. (Oh the irony of the IAF operating out of an Iraqi AF base! The Iraqis probably wouldn’t like that too well, though. But, you never know: Iraq and Iran fought several long, bloody wars.)

    In related news, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has called for Israeli to make such a strike.

  • 06Dec
    Categories: Political Comments: 1

    From either orr:

    Paul Martin Jr. declared last week that he LOVES Canada!

    He loves it so much that:

    • His family’s company is chartered in Barbados, not Canada, in order to dodge the significantly higher Canadian tax burden.
    • His family’s company builds its ships in China, not Canada, leaving hundreds of qualified Canadian shipbuilders out of work.
    • His family’s company ships fly other foreign flags, again to avoid giving Canada its fiscal due.
    • His family’s company ships are noted for dumping their sweepings into the Great Lakes, contributing to the pollution thereof.

    If he loves Canada, I’d hate to think about what things would be like if he didn’t.

  • 06Dec
    Categories: Blogosphere Comments: 6

    Well, the annual Weblog Awards is now live and taking votes! Hop over and vote! You can vote once in each category every 24 hours. Some of my buddies (and semi-buddies) are finalists. Please take a second to vote!

    Best Conservative Blog – Vote for Commonwealth Conservative (listed as VA Conservative)! I would love to see Chad get this award! He has done an excellent job covering the off-election year. (And, of course, the state in which he resides helped with that.) If you don’t vote in any of these other categories, vote in this one! Please!

    Best Business Blog – Vote for Blog for Books! Stacy Harp gives me free books! And she gets paid for it! Sounds like a good business to me! She’s also a very sweet, Christian lady. She definitely deserves this award.

    Best Law Blog – Vote for Stop the ACLU! Go vote for Jay. He’s a super nice guy (added poor little me to his blogroll a long time ago) and has a great agenda to boot!

    Best Humor/Comics Blog – Vote for IMAO! I used to like ScrappleFace better, but now I’m not so sure. IMAO isn’t as consistently funny, but they are gut-achingly funny when they are. Vote for IMAO. If you don’t vote for IMAO, vote for ScrappleFace. I like SpaceMonkey from IMAO because I got lots of traffic from the Carnival of Comedy. Plus I like people with oversized space helmets. Plus I like someone who’s on my level intellectually (monkey).

    Best Media Journalist Blog – Vote for Michael Yon! Michael Yon was an independent, embedded journalist in Iraq for a while. He had AMAZING coverage. He had a series of photographs of soldiers get ambushed, shot, and falling down. He was right there in the streets. He was right in the thick of the action. He captured the nitty, gritty. He is the obvious choice.

    Update: I didn’t know that basil of basil’s blog was a finalist! Definitely vote for him in the Best New Blogs category! He’s done a great job. I read his every post, which is more than I can say for a lot of blogs out there.

  • 05Dec
    Categories: Humor, Political Comments: 0

    Wow. I love the left. They invite me to go skiing with them. (But that’s getting off-topic.) I love the left because they make me laugh. I read Daily Kos on a Daily Basis. I read ScrappleFace and IMAO on a daily basis as well. I read all three for the same reason. The content is much the same. Except IMAO and Scrappleface don’t use gratuitous profanity. Today, the good ol’ DK has produced a classic. I couldn’t let y’all miss out. I laughed out loud. That’s rare when I am on the computer. I internalize my amusement when I am not physically interacting with someone. So when I am on the computer and I laugh out loud, it means that it really struck me funny. Now, I’m not talking about when I type “LOL” to you in an IM conversation. I do that all the time. I never “Laugh Out Loud” when I type “LOL”. Who does? But, enough off-topic rambling; here you go. The title of the post is NYTimes: ScAlito Admires His Father

    The New York Times ran this story on its front page today – Court Nominee Presents Father As Role Model:

    When a Democratic senator asked the Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr. why he might empathize with the plight of minorities or the poor, he had his answer ready: the example of his late father, an Italian immigrant who in college once defended a black basketball player from discrimination on the team. When other Democrats pressed Judge Alito about why he had once disagreed with the Warren Court decision that established the “one person, one vote” standard for state districts, he again recalled the legacy of his father, Samuel A. Alito, who worked for three decades as the director of research for the New Jersey Legislature.

    . . . As Judge Alito prepares for his confirmation hearings next month, the elder Mr. Alito is emerging as a larger-than-life hero in the story his son presents to the public. Their relationship provides the kind of humanizing details that political advisers often encourage Supreme Court nominees to offer. And Judge Alito has often invoked his father’s legacy to help deflect questions from skeptical Democrats.

    Still, some [emphasis added] colleagues and friends of the elder Mr. Alito, who died in 1987, said they had never heard [Wow! Amazing! You didn't know Mr. Alito as well as his son?!? What a surprise...] some of the stories his son has recounted, including the episode about his support for the black student and the fact that his father immigrated from Italy as a child. Some of the elder Mr. Alito’s colleagues said they first learned that he was born in Italy when President Bush mentioned it in announcing the nomination. [Demonstrating their rank ignorance of an easily verifiable fact.]

    Well, that’s quite the scoop there from the Times. Definitely meriting the Page One treatment it got. [I thought he was being sarcastic at first. It was brilliant sarcastic humor! I laughed out loud! Then I realize he was serious...] That pretty much wraps it up for me. [So, hearsay from a couple of friends, who clearly didn't know Alito very well, that said that Alito might be exaggerating stories of his father a little bit (what son doesn't?) totally settles it in poor Armando's mind that Alito is an unsuitable Supreme Court candidate. Notice what Armando says next. It is quite appropriate.]

    What a farce. I think we now know more about Judge Alito’s father now than we do about him based only on the New York Times’ coverage. [Lol! (Right now I am laughing out loud!) Read that sentence three times and let the delicious irony sweep over you!]

    Great, Judge Alito. You loved your father.

    You can’t make this stuff up! Scrappleface couldn’t have done a better parody of the liberal position on Alito!

  • 03Dec
    Categories: Music Comments: 3

    Paul Aldrich - Mock n RollI was not overly impressed with Mock n Roll, a Christian humor album by Paul Aldrich. Most of the stuff wasn’t very funny, IMHO. Furthermore, a couple of the jokes weren’t in best taste. When you have a CD whose purported merits are that it’s funny and Christian, you aren’t in a very good postion when it doesn’t excel at either. There were definitely some funny songs and from watching some videos from his site, I can tell right away that he’s a lot funnier in person as a result of his stage presence. Unfortunately, his CDs don’t convey his facial expressions very well.

    Don’t get me wrong. I love parody music. I like a lot of Weird Al Yankovich and a couple of Ray Steven’s songs. However, I just didn’t find this very funny. If I had to pay for it, I wouldn’t buy it. I have listened to it a single time and it has lain untouched ever since. 3 stars out of 5.

    This CD was given to me for free by the artist/label to review through my arrangement with Mind & Media. I receive no other compensation from them. As you may have seen from some of my negative reviews, I have no compunctions about saying it like it is simply because they gave it to me free.

  • 03Dec

    No More Christian Nice Guy To start off this review, let’s take a look at an excerpt from No More Christian Nice Guy: When being nice–instead of Good–hurts men, women, and children:

    It’s hell being a Christian Nice Guy until you embrace Christ’s tough, courageous protective, assertive personality, which invigorates real male sensibilities. These qualities are found on the more rugged end of the male spectrum, currently not well represented in the church, which overemphasizes Christ’s gentler side at the expense of honest and healthy balance.

    Here’s a story that I hope will help to clarify. I call it the Parable of Jim.

    Jim is a thirty-something teacher to whom people are drawn. But Jim breaks all kinds of rules. He’s confrontational, opinionated, filled with will-power.

    He threatens to fight scoundrels who are making money off of religion, even grabbing their TV camera, a tool for this sordid gain, and smashing it to the ground, creating one long commercial break.

    He has called his students dumb and dull, asking how much longer he’ll have to endure their company.

    In order to stem his influence, his enemies play word games and devise interview scenarios in which to embarass him; he’s so cunning and shrewd that he constantly shows them up instead. No one has the guts to talk the way he does. Others talk like they understand God; Jim talks like he knoew God. Jim forcefully disrupts the order of things and disregards convention. Jim’s inappropriate.

    He calls people bad names that “respectable men” never say. He verbally confronts one of his most powerful government officials. When Jim has faced an authority figure who, because of manufactured charges, could actually invoke the death penalty, Jim’s slow-to-come responses have been obscure, searing, and disrespectful.

    Jim doesn’t mind his manners around important persons. Jim causes problems for society’s respectable people. No wonder they want to pull him down.

    In one public speech, to illustrate a profound spiritual truth, Jim has spoken of excrement going into a drain. He’s colorful, but some think his language is too coarse for a spiritual leader, and the press has a field day: PREACHER OR POTTYMOUTH? YOU DECIDE.

    He has told reporters that his mission isn’t to discover or promote a lifetime of warm and cozy. Au contraire: “I bring division and conflict! Live as I say you should,” he tells morning news shows over coffee and crumpets, and it may “tear your families apart!” Then he states the obvious: “Those who don’t find me offensive will be blesed.” Who booked this guy? Regis wonders, glancing at security,, hoping they’re keeping a sharp eye. Who in the world does he think he is? muse countless others.

    Jim is sarcastic, sometimes bitingly so; he doesn’t apologize. Jim goes to parties and hangs out with others who do. At least once he has suplied the wine, for free, during a wedding where children were likely present. Drinks are on him, even though he knows he’ll be accused of corrupting others and touting singulness. The bureauccrats and government workers with whom he spends time are the ones everybody hates. Jim doesn’t even shun mentally imbalanced devotees or politically leprous radicals.

    Many murmur and complain that they don’t understand him. His own students sometimes won’t ask him questions because they fear his response.

    Most religious leaders enjoy the attention of large crowds, but Jim’s wary: He doesn’t trust them, and he doesn’t hide his distrust. He actually confronts empty compliments during public gatherings–not a seeker-friendly ministry approach. Even though he still takes students, Jim’s been unemployed for at least three years and doesn’t even look for a job. He lives off handouts, owns no property, doesn’t even have his own cardboard box to return to at night.

    One choice that led to further attacks was Jim’s allowing a prostitute–in public–to annoint him with rare and expensive oil that could have been used to feed the poor, support missionaries, or pay for part of a child’s lifesaving surgery. While his students and his opponents boiled with anger over this wasteful extravagance, Jim would not hear it denounced and had the audacity to say that whenever God’s liberating message is preached, this one event will be mentioned favorably. The woman wiped Jim’s feet with her own hair, a lure she has used to draw men to her bed, but he has no care for his reputation. The scandal of it all! Hear the good folk gossip! Film at eleven!

    He warns his students that people will despise them. Some will even be brought to court by blackmailers with unfair charges. Jim tells them to pay off the blackmailer before it foes that far. He instructs one student to sell some clothing in order to buy a weapon.

    Jim, who’s loving kind, and compassionate, is not owned or influenced by fear and shame, Still, he does all the above and more, which begs the question: Do you think Jim’s a “good Christian man”? Is he a Nice Guy?

    This is part of the life of Christ as recorded in the Gospels, but are you surprised by how foreign some of it looks? If we compare these actions ofJesus to the behavior expected of the average guy in most churches today–and, if we were honest–we’d say, absurdly, that Christ is not a “Christian.” We wouldn’t pray to him; we’d issue prayer requests for him.

    Something doesn’t add up.

    That pretty much sums up the book. We are presented a sanitized version of Jesus that is nice, kind, respectful, gentle and non-violent, while really Jesus was sarcastic, loving, funny, kind, violent, and disrespectful to authorities.

    I agree with much of what the book says, but the CNG (as he likes to call us: Christian Nice Guys) inside of me says: “No!”

    I think if we give credence to this model, it becomes ever so much more so incumbent upon us to make sure that our motives are always pure and that we are acting in a Biblical way. It was easy for Jesus to be all these unpleasant things while remaining unsinful because he was perfect, his motives were always right, and the doctrines driving his motives were always correct. We don’t have that characteristic. We’re prone to be sarcastic in a way that is sinful. We are prone to shout, not because we are excited about God, but because we are personally offended. We don’t get violent to protect God’s honor, but to protect our own. We call people names not to illustrate a Biblical point and to call people to repentance, but rather to make them look bad and to elevate ourselves. We don’t diss people so they will be shocked to a closer walk with Jesus, but to burnish our own ego.

    While much of what he said may be true, we need to be very, very careful as we put any of this into action because of our latent sinful tendencies.

    I’d give this book four stars out of five.

    This book was given to me for free by the author/publisher to review through my arrangement with Mind & Media. I receive no other compensation from them. As you may have seen from some of my negative reviews, I have no compunctions about saying it like it is simply because they gave it to me free. If you buy the book through the link above, I will get a commission from Amazon.

  • 03Dec
    Categories: Music Comments: 2

    Randall Harp's LogikosRandall Harp is great composer! His name is obviously very appropriate in regards to his great grasp of things musical. I reviewed his sampler CD that he sent me and I was really wowed! I enjoyed so much listening to his music. I was playing the CD there at work and not one, but two people complimented me on what beautiful music it was and asked where they could get it. One was a customer and the other was a co-worker. I give it a definite 5 stars out of 5. I would buy anything put out by Mr. Harp!

    This CD was given to me for free by the Randall K. Harp to review through my arrangement with Mind & Media. I receive no other compensation from them. As you may have seen from some of my negative reviews, I have no compunctions about saying it like it is simply because they gave it to me free.

  • 03Dec
    Categories: Humor, Political Comments: 0

    The Little Red Hen

    Once upon a time, on a farm in Indiana, there was a little red hen who scratched about the barnyard until she uncovered quite a few grains of wheat. She called all of her neighbors together and said, “If we plant this wheat, we shall have bread to eat. Who will help me plant it?”

    “Not I,” said the cow.

    “Not I,” said the duck.

    “Not I,” said the pig.

    “Not I,” said the goose.

    “Then I will do it by myself,” said the little red hen. And so she did;

    The wheat grew very tall and ripened into golden grain. “Who will help me reap my wheat?” asked the little red hen.

    “Not I,” said the duck.

    “Out of my classification,” said the pig.

    “I’d lose my seniority,” said the cow.

    “I’d lose my unemployment compensation,” said the goose.

    “Then I will do it by myself,” said the little red hen, and so she did.

    At last it came time to bake the bread.

    “Who will help me bake the bread?” asked the little red hen.

    “That would be overtime for me,” said the cow.

    “I’d lose my welfare benefits,” said the duck.

    “I’m a dropout and never learned how,” said the pig.

    “If I’m to be the only helper, that’s discrimination,” said the goose.

    “Then I will do it by myself,” said the little red hen. She baked five loaves and held them up for all of her neighbors to see. They wanted some and, in fact, demanded a share. But the little red hen said, “No, I shall eat all five loaves.”

    “Excess profits!” cried the cow.

    “Capitalist leech!” screamed the duck.

    “I demand equal rights!” yelled the goose.

    The pig just grunted in disdain.

    And they all painted “Unfair!” picket signs and marched around and around the little red hen, shouting obscenities.

    Then a government agent came, he said to the little red hen, “You must not be so greedy.”

    “But I earned the bread,” said the little red hen.

    “Exactly,” said the agent. “That is what makes our free enterprise system so wonderful. Anyone in the barnyard can earn as much as he wants. But under our modern government regulations, the productive workers must divide the fruits of their labor with those who are lazy and idle.”

    And they all lived happily ever after, including the little red hen, who smiled and clucked, “I am grateful, for now I truly understand.”

    But her neighbors became quite disappointed in her. She never again baked bread because she joined the “party” and got her bread free.

    And all the social democrats smiled. ‘Fairness’ had been established. Individual initiative had died, but nobody noticed; perhaps no one cared… as long as there was free bread that “the rich” were paying for.

    Origin unknown. Hat tip: OperationFreedom

  • 01Dec
    Categories: Humor Comments: 3

    Here’s the Carnival of Comedy. Sorry it was late. Our internet was down. I was on the roof fixing it. Yes, the roof. We get our internet through some 802.11g antennas on the roof.

    Don’t read anything in the last category. It’s not a bit funny. Sorry to those that submitted and ended up in the last category, nothing personal. Read the Really funny category. If you are sitting around twiddling your thumbs and have time on your hands, read the Pretty funny category. By no means read anything in the last category. Most of it is profanity laced foolishness that didn’t make me crack a smile, much less laugh. I only linked it cuz I had to, as carnival host. How about instituting some editorial powers, SpaceMonkey?

    Really funny

    Ferdinand T. Cat at Conservative Cat presents The Truth Behind the Legend

    Dr. Phat Tony at Dr. Phat Tony’s presents Dems Call Shenanigans on Vote

    NOTR at rofasix.blogspot.com presents So! What’s in the Box?

    tommy at Striving For Average presents A Game

    Pretty funny

    James Wigderson at Wigderson Library & Pub presents Unhinged Lower Jaw Action

    Buckley F. Williams at The Nose On Your Face presents Detonation Is Temporary, Pride Is Forever

    Steve at Steve the Pirate presents The Adventures of Reverse Robin Hood! – Mild Language Warning

    bob at either orr presents The seven stages of Christmas lights, phase one

    BroGonzo at A Healthy Alternative to Work presents Christmas Past visits Mr. Irvin

    The Evil Emperor Mindstation at Point Five presents Parents Groups Protest Video Game F.E.A.R.

    Mr. Right at The Right Place presents Presenting: The DNC’s “Sounds of the Season” – Mild Language Warning

    Not really funny at all – Did you submit this to the wrong carnival by mistake?

    Josh Cohen at Multiple Mentality presents A Grimm BlogUpdate: This is kinda funny, but I couldn’t quite justify putting it into the middle category. All the things I said about the last category don’t apply to this post, but I really couldn’t justify putting it into the middle category…

    Steve Pavlina at Steve Pavlina’s Personal Development Blog presents Musings on Reality, the Scientific Method, and the Cure for Dandruff

    Ziba Dearden at Once More Into the Breach presents Canadian Defense Minister Admits UFO’s Exist

    Peakah at Peakah’s Provocations… presents Hitler in a Headscarf

    Bill Adams at Idler Yet presents Saddam reminds me of old story

    Guillaume McDowell at Motopolitico presents An Endorsement of my “Lady-ing” abilities

    FIAR at Radioactive Liberty presents Post-Thanksgiving Thanksgiving Post

    Random Yak at Random Yak presents Wednesday Frivol

    Peemil at Where are my socks? presents News from Peemil’s life in Australia.Language Warning and it’s not a bit funny

    Toy Mama at Mental Rhinorrhea presents Mind your manners!Crudeness Warning

    —————————–

    I guess I’m spoiled by quality humor from ScrappleFace and IMAO (podcast)…

    The next three carnivals will be hosted at:

    Dec 8 – Blonde Sagacity
    Dec 15 – Right Wing Testimonial
    Dec 22 – Cadet Happy