• 28Jan

    Yay for shooting down Interstate 66 at 70 MPH with the windows open rocking out (ok, not quite the right words, but you get the picture) to Christmas with Chanticleer.

    Boo for an obnoxious dad who kept yelling at his son at the bowling alley to “Don’t drop your shoulder, Chad!” and “OOOoohh! It cheated you out of a strike!” He said these phrases and variations thereof many, many times quite loudly.

    Yay for putting a car remote to your head to increase the range. I kid you not. Try it sometime. Stand at about twice the range that your keyfob remote usually works. Try to unlock your car. When it doesn’t work, put the keyfob to your temple and try again.

    Yay for getting a new laptop! Yay for getting my server back up! Yay for getting a new pair of skis!

  • 24Jan

    “I was a tax-cutting mayor, and I’ll be a tax-cutting governor.”

    - Tim Kaine television ad, campaign for governor in 2005

    Tim Kaine, now that he has been safely sworn in as governor, has just proposed a $4 billion tax increase.

    Update: I forgot to mention that for FY 2004 there was a budget surplus of $1.6 billion (which was quickly gobbled up with one-time expenditures and uncooking the funny books) and for FY 2005 there was a budget surplus of $1 billion.

    So in summary, Kaine said he would cut taxes, but instead he is raising trying to raise them in the face of a $1 billion budget surplus.

  • 22Jan

    Nate Keller (a.k.a. theotherside or countrytech) is a graphics designer who describes himself as a high-tech redneck. He blogs at The Fine Coffee Aficionado. He is one of the leading members of MennoDiscuss. Some of his interests are graphics, computers, anything related to Cabela’s, racing, Jeff Foxworthy, truck & tractor pulling, deep sea fishing, boating, and hosting LAN parties.

    There is a perplexing problem facing our society today, it is the problem created when facts collide with what we believe. This problem is far-reaching from the Ivy-League lawyers at Harvard and Yale, and extends into the very fabric and core of many of today’s “Christian” churches. Hardly a week goes by that I haven’t heard the phrase, “Well, I don’t believe that, so it doesn’t pertain to me”. Wrong.

    Let’s use our universe as an example. Suppose a giant meteor is hurdling towards earth at 85,000 miles per hour. Now, if it was still several million miles away, maybe NASA overlooked it, or it was dark and nobody could see it, neither do they believe anything like that could happen to earth, does that change the fact? Just because someone says “I don’t believe that” does that mean we are safe? Obviously not.

    Now you might ask, “What kind of ignorant person would say that?” I know that may be a bit stretched example, but think abut it, millions of people play that very same “I don’t believe” card every day in relation to their eternal destiny. How many people have you heard say “You believe what you want to, and I will believe what I want to.” Even in Christianity many people use that excuse to do what they want to. “I don’t believe…. because my pastor says it doesn’t mean that.”

    Now, please do not misunderstand me and think that I have a problem with pastors. I have a high regard for the office of pastor, and feel strongly that a pastor should be one of the first people we consult with a difficult or serious question. I believe that they hold a wealth of often untapped wisdom simply because of the many hours they have spent studying God’s Word. I do however, have a problem when what a pastor says, does not line up with what the Bible says.

    I John 4:1-3 says: “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

    Now the question is, how then, are we to know (or test) these spirits or doctrines? Just as we study in college or to obtain some kind of certification for our job, we need to study God’s Word to learn what doctrines are true, so we can spiritually succeed in life. In Acts 17, the Bereans were highly commended because they searched the scriptures to see if what the Apostle Paul was saying was true. They wanted to be sure that their beliefs were grounded in God’s unchanging and never-failing word.

    We need to genuinely search the scriptures to see if what we are being told is true. The temptation is to go through life just listening to what others are saying, and then pick and choose what we want to believe. But if you stop to think about it, just like the meteor illustration, this type of belief system is fatal, and the pick-and-choose method of beliefs can have eternal ramifications.

    So many people today, try to water down what the Bible is saying and by distorting part of a single verse they can make the Bible say just about anything they want it to. What God calls sin, they try to tone down so that they don’t offend anyone. Folks, what God calls sin is sin, whether or not we want to believe it. To the person who is not committed to serving God, or is knowingly violating one of his commandments, the truth is going to hurt. Until we are willing to submit to God’s authority, and correct anything that we know isn’t right in our lives, it is going to be offensive. God’s Word is truth and it reproves the world of sin.

    It can really hurt. It can feel like a torch burning into steel to remove the dross in our lives that is not God-honoring. And until we are honest with ourselves, and face the facts, its going to keep hurting, at least until our conscience is seared, and we are no longer sensitive to God’s leading in our lives, and then, it can be too late. We don’t want to face the struggle. We tend to avoid having to change things in our lives that we have grown accustomed to and maybe even begin to rely on. But when we cross the point of knowing fact, and not accepting or believing it, we begin down a very dangerous and slippery slope, because no more, do we have a foundation for the rest of our beliefs.

    Psalm 11 says, “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?” Think about it, if we throw out part of God’s Word and say we don’t believe it, then we can no longer base our beliefs on the Bible because we have just rendered our own arguments untenable and baseless. You can see a real life example in the American Public School System. When prayer was banned, and the courts ruled that schools could no longer teach the true creation account and made the Bible illegal in schools, chaos ensued. No longer was there a moral system for right or wrong. Teenage pregnancies, robberies, swearing, violence, and yes, murder rates soared to astounding levels, and the rate increases every year. What happened? We lost our belief system. There was no longer a moral compass to follow, and if someone wants to do something, they do it, and no one can tell them why it is right or wrong, because there is no foundation on which to base their belief.

    The same is true in our churches today. When a church decides to throw out a principle because they say it was only practical or applied to people back in the Bible times, they have taken the same step. Because if one part of the Bible is outdated, who is to say that the next part isn’t? Who knows, If I say “Well, maybe the whole bit about the creation account is not really how the earth came about,” then I might as well say, “Hey, I don’t really think God would send anyone to hell.”" I can try to distort, and find a way to merge the creation account with Darwinism so that I don’t offend anyone who may believe in evolution. But does that change the fact? I should then be able to reason that since God is so loving, he can’t send anyone to hell, and then I may as well reason that since I already discarded half of the Scripture, I might as well dump the rest and just say I don’t really believe in a God, or a life after death, I think man is basically good and can determine his own destiny. See my point? It is very critical that we grasp this concept, and be sure that we are not discarding God’s Word, and then lose our own sense of direction and purpose in life.

    Like it or not, everyone of us from the President of the USA to the bum on the street, to the pastor in a church is going to stand before and almighty God who knows everything, knows what we said, even our most private thoughts that we never said. What are we going to say? This time the “I don’t believe it” line isn’t going to work, and we better be sure that we know what we believed and that it was firmly based on the word of God, and not just what some guy’s blog on the internet said. Don’t take my word for it, search the scriptures, work out what you believe, and remember this: Just because you don’t believe, doesn’t change the fact, simply believing something does not make it fact.

  • 18Jan

    Y’all may or may not be aware that some SEO wizards are holding a contest for the term “V7ndotcom elursrebmem“. Whoever makes their site rank the highest for that term receives seven thousand dollars and an iPod. There’s a guy that is trying to win the contest that is donating 100% of the proceeds to the University of Maryland Center for Celiac Research. My sister has Celiac, a disease that causes gluten (wheat, barley, oats) intolerance. I am supporting this guy’s chances of winning with the following link which boosts his search engine ranking for the linked term. V7ndotcom elursrebmem. You can support celiac research by adding a similiar link to your own site.

  • 09Jan

    Hello, ladies and gents, and welcome to the 18th edition of the Virginia Blog carnival!

    Rocinante’s Burdens starts us off. I never was quite able to figure Rocinante out. For one, all the quotes on the sidebar and in the top are as if Mr. Rocinante is a horse. (I won’t make any comments about his posts being long in the mouth. *grin*) Then I looked up Rocinante in Wikipedia (Actually, I typed “wiki Rocinante” into my Firefox address bar, which brings up the Wikipedia entry for it.) on the hunch that this might be a fictional character. I was right. Rocinante is a horse. A fictional horse. Thus, in this post, I think he is concerned about animal rights. At least he was when he was confused, then he got unconfused and was concerned about human’s rights. The human right to not get murdered. And he’s concerned that murderous rapists don’t get exonerated unfairly. (Yes, you did read that last sentence right.) And he points out that it hasn’t been shown that a single innocent person has ever been executed. Go read it. Good stuff. (Except, as a Christian, I would hardly endorse his post title as a worthy sentiment…)

    Different Rivers comes up to bat second. He dives into that paragon of simplicity (not!) that is the US Tax Code. He makes the case that the tax code encourages couples to live together before marriage. Now, it’s really complicated, but I’m having a hard time seeing why I should muster any outrage. It seems to me that the tax code is, in this case, marriage agnostic. However, IANAL and IACertainlyNATaxAccountant, so don’t believe anything I say. Nevertheless, a very interesting look at the tax exemption on primary residence real estate gains.

    Sophistpundit is up next with a simple thesis and that thesis is about unions and Mr. Sophistpundit has a conservative view of unions. You have three guesses as to what his thesis is, and the first three don’t count. (What a pathetically overused cliche phrase that is! At least it has a twist…) Anyway, a hearty amen to that post. You can even take most of the post and apply it to Affirmative Action while you’re at it.

    Doug, from Below the Beltway (love the blog name!), writes a point by point rebuttal to our beloved Brother Chappaquidick, the lovable teddy-bear liberal (now that the ‘04 election is over, can we admit that he really is more liberal (or more crazy, take your pick) than John Kerry?) senator from Massachusetts, as regards the confirmation hearings of the honorable Samuel Anthony Alito Jr.

    Once More, a Trip to the Beach (or some-such blog) has a great post up about the Navy allowing real prayers by its chaplains versus watered-down, politically correct, “cross-faith” “prayers”. (If you try to pray to all the gods out there, I betcha none of them will listen.) Great post. It touches upon something of which I had not been aware. I’m glad it turned out the way it did. If we don’t watch it, next thing we know we’ll end up like the French (banning religious symbols in public). I have a question: Since this is clearly a religious freedom issue and thus a civil rights issue, why aren’t the Democrats jumping to advocate freedom to pray as the chaplains like? I thought the Dems like to tout themselves as the upholders of civil rights and to portray conservatives as the evil corporations that are trampling civil rights. What’s wrong with this picture?

    The Virginia Partisan weighs in with a partisan look at a classically partisan issue that is really probably the most defining partisan issue in the United States, yea the world: economic and social policy. I agree 100%. Great post. The VA Partisan is a new blog (if I recall right from CC) that bears watching.

    Finally, Sir Alton of I’m Not Emeril tells us, in a Dr. Seussian way, why he hasn’t been blogging recently. I claim this post as my own and I apply to my own blog.

    That’s all folks! And a great “all” it was. I think maybe I should just stop blogging and sit back and read all the other VA blogs instead. Y’all do such a much better job than do I.

    One thing I noticed, however, was that we seem to be actively ignoring Chad’s request that he “would prefer our political bloggers send us something non-political, if possible.” I’m Not Emeril is the sole participant to send a non-partisan entry. Also, every single blog that participated is a conservative blog. Let’s change that. C’mon Waldo, Josh, Lowell, Kenton, and Blue Dog! We won’t be (too) mean to you!

    The next carnival is at Virginia Centrist. (Maybe that will bring some of the liberal bloggers out of the woodwork.)

  • 07Jan
    Categories: Sports Comments: 1

    The Redskins defense beat the Buccaneers this afternoon! The Redskins had the lowest ever offensive yardage in the NFL post-season while still winning. The defense was amazing. The Skins first TD came from a ball that was tipped by a defensive lineman into the hands of LaVar Arrington who ran it to the 6. Clinton Portis put it in the endzone the next play. The second TD was on one play where Marcus Washington (Skins linebacker)forced a fumble from Cadillac (the Bucs running back). Marcus W. recovered and ran for about 5-8 yards and then fumbled it when he got hit. Sean Taylor (Skins Safety) scooped it up and ran 50 yards for a touchdown. Near the end of the game, after both teams had picked up a FG (and the Bucs had scored a TD) and the score stood at 10-17, Chris Simms (TB QB) threw a deep ball to his third receiver in the endzone. It was a perfect throw. The WR had the CB beat. It went right into his hands. We were despairing and thinking OT. But, the official ruled, and replay showed, that as the CB tackled him in the end zone, he lost control of the ball. Incomplete pass. *whew* The next play the same receiver ran the same route and was wide open in the same exact place and Chris Simms threw to him, but he majorly overthrew him. A couple of plays later, the defensive line tipped another ball into the air which Marcus Washington picked off to end the game.

  • 01Jan
    Categories: Sports Comments: 1

    The Redskins are going to the playoffs for the first time since 1999! The Eagles started off very strong and it looked like it was going to be a standard Redskins ending, but then the ‘Skins fought back to a 31-20 finish! The key was the 6 turnovers the defense forced. Viva la Redskins!