<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God said Pi isn&#8217;t 3.14?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hansmast.com/2007/06/god-said-pi-isnt-314/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hansmast.com/2007/06/god-said-pi-isnt-314/</link>
	<description>Pictures of the world, religious commentary, political thoughts, technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:12:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://hansmast.com/2007/06/god-said-pi-isnt-314/comment-page-1/#comment-358928</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hansmast.com/?p=556#comment-358928</guid>
		<description>Wow! The photo of Turkey on this page is absolutely Gorgeous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! The photo of Turkey on this page is absolutely Gorgeous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alton Foley</title>
		<link>http://hansmast.com/2007/06/god-said-pi-isnt-314/comment-page-1/#comment-98226</link>
		<dc:creator>Alton Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 21:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hansmast.com/?p=556#comment-98226</guid>
		<description>Tools. The question is simply a matter of tools, guys.

As an engineer I have at my disposal any number of measuring instruments, or tools. Some are highly accurate, some are much less so. I have even been known to measure an item with a piece of string when a speedy method of measuring was more important than precision.

I (and every other engineer in the world) also use various degrees of precision when referring to numbers. Hans is absolutely correct when he says 3 is equal to 3.0 or 3.00. He&#039;s also correct when he says that out here in the real world 3.14 may as well be 3.

Only in a lab or machine shop is precise measurement crucial. Assume we&#039;re talking in inches. 0.14 inch is just a shade over an eighth of an inch. OK, it&#039;s 9/64 if you really want precision. But is it really? No. 9/64ths of an inch is actually 0.140625.

As to pi, I myself use 3, (just 3, not 3.14) when I&#039;m describing the diameter-to-circumference ratio of a circle when precision is not required and a quick calculation is desired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tools. The question is simply a matter of tools, guys.</p>
<p>As an engineer I have at my disposal any number of measuring instruments, or tools. Some are highly accurate, some are much less so. I have even been known to measure an item with a piece of string when a speedy method of measuring was more important than precision.</p>
<p>I (and every other engineer in the world) also use various degrees of precision when referring to numbers. Hans is absolutely correct when he says 3 is equal to 3.0 or 3.00. He&#8217;s also correct when he says that out here in the real world 3.14 may as well be 3.</p>
<p>Only in a lab or machine shop is precise measurement crucial. Assume we&#8217;re talking in inches. 0.14 inch is just a shade over an eighth of an inch. OK, it&#8217;s 9/64 if you really want precision. But is it really? No. 9/64ths of an inch is actually 0.140625.</p>
<p>As to pi, I myself use 3, (just 3, not 3.14) when I&#8217;m describing the diameter-to-circumference ratio of a circle when precision is not required and a quick calculation is desired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

