Comments on: Stupid Drudge Headline: $2.2M A Word

By: Hans Mast

Hans Mast — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:18:41 +0000

This is an example of these things, most of the time he doesn’t have that problem.

By: Nic Miller

Nic Miller — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:02:28 +0000

I thought that was your opinion on Drudge, so I was naturally confused about the “dishonesty”, “inconsistency”, “partisan” tags on the post.

Drudge is my only go-to site for news as well. I suppose you’re the wiser for taking everything with a grain of salt.

By: Hans Mast

Hans Mast — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:32:06 +0000

I like Drudge quite a lot. It’s the only news page I check on a regular basis.

By: Nic Miller

Nic Miller — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:30:41 +0000

I think the math works out, actually. Couple hundred words per page. . .

How do you feel about Drudge?

By: Eugene

Eugene — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:24:02 +0000

Is Drudge’s point the money:word ratio or the total size of the bill? 1990 pages and $2.2m/word communicates the scale of the whole rather than the expense of the details.